Recent News
 
2009-05-15
Author:ADRIENNE ROLWES
A CROP OF CHILDREN?
In the face of yet another grotesque Obama policy decision on the issue of life, famed bioethicist Wesley J. Smith pondered a similar question. On his blog, he wondered why on earth Obama would take the totally unnecessary action he did in undoing executi
 
 
2009-05-10
Author:AMELIE TORRE
WATERS THAT ARE ALWAYS FRESH: GOD’S GRACE IN THE SACRAMENTS
Many Catholics do not know this very consoling truth; the grace of God reaches us through his sacraments ex opere operato. For many this is a meaningless Latin phrase, but it packs a punch when examined more closely.
Blogs
Send a friend Print Download into Palm Download PDF Comments
A CROP OF CHILDREN?
Author: ADRIENNE ROLWES
Last Post Date: 2009-05-15
“In the face of yet another grotesque Obama policy decision on the issue of life, famed bioethicist Wesley J. Smith pondered a similar question. On his blog, he wondered why on earth Obama would take the totally unnecessary action he did in undoing executive order 13435. Smith’s conclusion: “I can think of only two reasons for this action…First, vindictiveness against all things "Bush" or policies considered by the Left to be "pro life;" and second, a desire to get the public to see unborn human life as a mere corn crop ripe for the harvest. So much for taking the politics out of science.” (from ‘Obama’s Stem Cell Disgrace’ by Guy Benson, Townhall.com, Sunday, March 15th, 2009)
Obama has decided to fund stem-cell research that specifically calls for the destruction of embryos, and has revoked all government funding for non-controversial stem-cell research. That is what happened when he silently revoked executive order 13435, all the while spinning a web of rhetoric about the necessary advance of science, and the necessity of choosing facts over ideology. Bush had supported this non-controversial brand of research, which, moreover, has been showing many more signs of success on the scientific level. What is very striking, however, is what Wesley J. Smith suggests; Obama wants ‘the public to see unborn human life as a mere corn crop ripe for the harvest.’

 

This phrase has some very thought-provoking associations.

 

If one were to travel through Louisiana nowadays, they might come across a certain Laura plantation in the little town of Vacherie. The former owner of this estate, a French expatriate, was a very shrewd businesswoman who decided that, given the high price of slaves in New Orleans, she would buy several females and only a few males in order to create ‘une cuvée d’enfants.’ That translates into ‘a (vintage) crop of children.’ Sound familiar?

 

No wonder her granddaughter, Laura Locoul Gore, decided to leave the plantation and start another life for herself in St. Louis, Missouri. She could not stomach the thought of inheriting the family business and thereby continuing to use human life so gratuitously for economic profit.

 

That was the era of slavery in the 1800s, but what Obama proposes is no different. Slavery is the use of human lives for one’s own profit, whether they are born or unborn. Embryonic stem-cell research is the slavery of the unborn, the wholesale slaughter of life to support a kind of living that cannot really be called living, because it strips the human being of anything ennobling or worthy of imitation. It is nothing less than a holocaust of the unborn so that the more powerful and more wealthy can continue to pursue their goals in peace. All the talk about embryonic research being able to save lives has no foundation in the actual research that has been done. Again and again, it is adult stem-cell research that has shown the best results; and now its funding has been revoked. So embryonic research will continue with a new wave of political and economic support. And all of this, done in the name of ‘science’, will ensure the continual flow of enormous sums of money into the hands of those who have no qualms about the moral monstrosities that this implies. There is no compassion for the weak; only the use of human persons for pleasure, profit, health, and anything else desirable. What will happen to the concept of ‘humanity’ at this point is anyone’s guess.

 

Or is it?

 

If more Americans were willing to stand up to defend life in all its stages without compromise, the story might turn out differently. Obama is our president, but we do not have to follow in his footsteps. We don’t have to remain on the plantation if it means slavery, if it means building an empire on the slaughter of the unborn and the destruction of thousands of women’s lives as well through abortion on demand. As Americans we need to respect the office of the president, but we don’t have to agree with him. If we are going to cease treating human lives as a corn crop, we need to hold fast to our principles and choose something else for ourselves, just as Laura did. It took her six years, however, to tell her family of her decision and to follow through with it. Hopefully it will not take Americans that long, given the high toll that the culture of death brings year by year and minute by minute.

 

P.R.C.A.G.D.

  -2010 Catholic Comments. All rights reserved. | Contact Us